Glassnode: Is Bitcoin Showing Signs of 2022 Pre-crash? Watch Out for a Key Range

By: blockbeats|2025/12/04 17:00:03
0
Share
copy
Original Article Title: Echoes of Early 2022
Original Source: CryptoVizArt, Chris Beamish, Antoine Colpaert, Glassnode
Original Translation: Bitpush News

Summary

· Bitcoin remains above the True Market Mean, but the broader market structure now resembles that of the first quarter of 2022, with over 25% of the supply in a state of loss.

· Capital momentum remains positive, supporting consolidation, although well below the mid-2025 peak.

· The 0.75–0.85 quantile range ($96.1K-$106K) is a key area for restoring market structure; a break below would increase downside risk.

· ETF fund flows have turned negative, spot Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD) has retreated, indicating weakening demand.

· Open interest in futures contracts has declined, funding rates have reset to neutral, reflecting a risk-averse stance.

· The options market shows implied volatility (IV) compression, softening skew, and a shift in fund flows from bearish options to cautious call writing. Options seem to be undervalued, with realized volatility exceeding implied volatility, putting pressure on short-gamma traders.

· Overall, the market remains fragile, relying on holding the key cost basis area unless a macro shock disrupts the balance.

Glassnode: Is Bitcoin Showing Signs of 2022 Pre-crash? Watch Out for a Key Range

On-Chain Insights

Bottoming or Breaking Down?

Over the past two weeks, the price of Bitcoin has fallen and found support near a key valuation anchor known as the True Market Mean—the cost basis of all non-dormant coins (excluding miners). This level typically marks the boundary between a mild bearish phase and a deep bear market. While the price has recently stabilized above this threshold, the broader market structure is increasingly echoing the dynamics of the first quarter of 2022.

Using the Supply Quantiles Cost Basis Model (which tracks the cost basis of a cluster of supply held by top buyers), this similarity becomes more pronounced. Since mid-November, the spot price has dropped below the 0.75 quantile, currently trading around $96.1K, putting over 25% of the supply in a loss position.

This creates a fragile balance between the risk of capitulation by top buyers and exhaustion by sellers forming the potential bottom. However, until the market is able to reclaim the 0.85 quantile (around $106.2K) as support, the current structure remains highly sensitive to macro shocks.

Pain Dominance

Based on this structural view, we can amplify our observation of the top buyer's supply situation through the "Total Supply in Loss" to gauge the dominance of pain, i.e., unrealized pain.

The 7-day simple moving average (7D-SMA) of this metric climbed to 7.1 million BTC last week — the highest level since September 2023 — highlighting that over two years of bull market price expansion is now facing two shallow bottoming stages.

The supply scale currently in a loss (ranging between 5 to 7 million BTC) is strikingly similar to the early 2022 consolidation phase, further reinforcing the above similarity. This comparison once again emphasizes that the true market mean is a crucial threshold to differentiate between a mild bear phase and transition to a more defined bear market.

Momentum Still Positive

Despite a strong resemblance to the first quarter of 2022, the capital momentum flowing into Bitcoin remains slightly positive, aiding in explaining the support near the true market mean and the subsequent recovery to above 90K.

This capital momentum is measurable through the Net Change in Realized Cap, currently standing at a monthly level of +$8.69 billion — far below the peak of $64.3 billion/month in July 2025 but still positive.

As long as the capital momentum stays above zero, the true market mean can continue to act as a consolidation area and potential accumulation zone rather than the beginning of a deeper downtrend.

Long-Term Holder Profitability Fading

Remaining in a positive capital inflow regime implies that new demand is still able to absorb the profit-taking of long-term holders. The Long-Term Holder SOPR (30D-SMA, measuring the spot price of active spending long-term holders divided by cost basis) has dropped sharply with the price but still remains above 1 (currently at 1.43). This emerging trend in profitability aligns once again with the structure of the first quarter of 2022: long-term holders continue to sell in profit, but the profitability is shrinking.

Despite stronger demand momentum at the beginning of 2022, liquidity continues to decline, forcing longs to hold above the true market value until a new wave of demand enters the market.

On-chain Insight

ETF Demand Weakening

Shifting to the spot market, net inflows into U.S. Bitcoin ETFs have significantly deteriorated, with their 3-day average firmly sliding into negative territory throughout November. This marks a breakdown from the sustained inflow status that supported prices earlier in the year, reflecting a cooling off in new capital allocation.

Fund outflows are widely distributed among issuers, indicating that as market conditions weaken, institutional participants are taking a more cautious stance. With spot market currently facing weakening demand, immediate buyer support has weakened, making prices more sensitive to external shocks and macro-driven volatility.

Spot Buying Pressure Weakening

In addition to the deterioration in ETF demand, the Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD) on major trading platforms has also fallen, with Binance and aggregate trading platforms showing a continued negative trend.

This indicates that sell-side driven selling pressure is steadily increasing, as traders cross the bid-ask spread not to accumulate but to mitigate risk. Even Coinbase, usually seen as a gauge of U.S. buying pressure, has remained flat, indicating a general retreat in spot-side conviction.

With ETF fund flows and spot CVD skewing defensive, the market now relies on a weaker demand foundation, making prices more susceptible to sustained declines and macro-driven volatility.

Open Interest Continues to Decline

Extending this weakening demand trend to the derivatives market, open interest in futures contracts has been steadily declining in late November. While the unwind has been orderly, it has been persistent, erasing much of the speculative positioning accumulated during the previous uptrend. With no significant new leverage entering the market, traders seem unwilling to express directional conviction but rather opt for a conservative, risk-averse posture as prices fall.

The derivatives complex is positioned in an evidently lighter leverage state, indicating a marked absence of speculative fervor and reducing the likelihood of sharp liquidation-driven volatility spikes.

Neutral Funding Rate Signaling Reset

As open interest in futures contracts continues to decline, the perpetual funding rate has cooled off to roughly neutral territory, hovering around zero most of the time in late November. This marks a significant shift compared to the previously observed high positive funding rates during the expansionary period, indicating that excess long positions have been mostly unwound. Importantly, the brief and fleeting period of mild negative funding rates suggests that despite the price drop, traders have not been actively building short positions.

This neutral to slightly negative funding structure indicates a more balanced derivatives market, with a lack of crowded long positions, reducing downside vulnerability and potentially laying the groundwork for a more constructive positioning as demand begins to stabilize.

Implied Volatility (IV) Across the Board Reset

Turning to the options market, implied volatility (IV) provides a clear window into how traders price future uncertainty. As a starting point, tracking implied volatility is useful as it reflects the market's expectations of future price movements. Implied volatility has reset lower after a high reading last week. With price struggling to break through the $92K resistance level and a lack of follow-through on the bounce, volatility sellers have stepped back in, pushing implied volatility lower across the board:

· Short-term contracts dropped from 57% to 48%

· Medium-term contracts dropped from 52% to 45%

· Long-term contracts dropped from 49% to 47%

This continued decline indicates that traders see a reduced likelihood of a sharp move to the downside and expect a calmer environment in the near term.

This reset also marks a shift towards a more neutral stance as the market emerges from last week's high caution.

Put Skew Eases

After observing implied volatility, skew helps clarify how traders assess downside risk versus upside risk. It measures the difference between the implied volatility of put options and call options.

When skew is positive, traders pay a premium for downside protection; when skew is negative, they pay more for upside exposure. The direction of skew is equally important as the level.

For example, an 8% short-term skew that moves down from 18% in two days conveys a markedly different message than if it were to move up from a negative value.

Short-term skew moved from 18.6% on Monday (during the drop to $84.5K driven by the Japanese bond narrative) to 8.4% on the rebound.

This suggests that the initial reaction was exaggerated. Longer-dated contracts adjust more slowly, indicating that traders are willing to chase short-term upside but remain uncertain about its sustainability.

Fear Wanes

Funding flow data shows a stark contrast between the past seven days and the subsequent rebound.

Earlier this week, activity was dominated by bearish option buying, reflecting fear of a reprise of the August 2024 price action tied to concerns about the potential unwinding of a Japan basis trade. Having been through this risk before, the market had a sense of the potential contagion and the typical recovery that would follow. Once the price stabilized, funding flows swiftly shifted: the rebound brought a decisive skew towards bullish option activity, nearly perfectly reversing the pattern seen during the pressure.

Notably, traders still hold a net long Gamma exposure at the current levels and this may persist until December 26 (the largest expiry of the year). Such positions typically dampen price action. Once that expiry passes, the positions will reset, and the market will embark on a new dynamic into 2026.

$100,000 Call Option Premium Evolution

Monitoring the call option premium at the $100,000 strike can shed light on how traders are approaching this key psychological level. On the chart's right side, the call option selling premium remains higher than the call option buying premium, and during the rebound of the past 48 hours, the gap between the two widened. This widening indicates that the belief in reclaiming $100,000 remains limited. This level is likely to face resistance, especially as implied volatility compresses on the move up and rebuilds on the move down. This pattern reinforces mean-reverting behavior of implied volatility within the current range.

A premium overview also shows that traders have not positioned for aggressive breakouts ahead of the FOMC meeting. Instead, funding flows reflect a more cautious stance where the upside is being sold rather than chased. Hence, the recent recovery has lacked the conviction typically required to challenge the significant $100,000 level.

Undervalued Volatility

When we combine the reset of implied volatility with this week's violent bi-directional moves, the result is a negative volatility risk premium. The volatility risk premium is typically positive as traders demand compensation for the risk of a volatility spike. Without this premium, traders shorting volatility cannot monetize the risk they are taking.

At the current level, implied volatility is lower than realized volatility, which means that the volatility used in option pricing is smaller than the volatility actually delivered by the market. This creates a favorable environment for taking a long Gamma position, as each price swing could potentially be profitable as long as the actual volatility exceeds the implied volatility priced into the options.

Conclusion

Bitcoin continues to trade in a structurally fragile environment, where on-chain weakness collides with diminishing demand, intertwined with a more cautious derivatives landscape. The price has temporarily stabilized above the "true market mean," but the broader structure currently mirrors closely that of Q1 2022: over 25% of the supply is underwater, realized losses are mounting, and sensitivity to macro shocks is heightened. Despite being far weaker than earlier this year, positive capital momentum remains one of the few constructive signals preventing a deeper market breakdown.

Off-chain indicators reinforce this defensive tone. ETF flows have turned net outflows, spot CVD metrics are receding, open interest in futures continues to decline orderly. Funding rates are nearing neutrality, reflecting neither bullish conviction nor pronounced bearish pressure. In the options market, implied volatility compression, skew softening, fund flows reversal, and options currently being priced relatively lower compared to realized volatility convey caution rather than a rekindled risk appetite.

Looking ahead, holding within the 0.75-0.85 quantile range ($96.1K-106K USD) is crucial for maintaining a stable market structure and reducing downside vulnerability heading into the end of the year.

Conversely, the "true market mean" remains the most likely area for bottom formation, unless negative macro catalysts disrupt the already delicate market balance.

Original Article Link

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more