How AI is Revolutionizing the Tech World: Insights from Benedict Evans

By: crypto insight|2025/11/27 17:30:04
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways:

  • AI is driving a significant platform shift in the tech world, reminiscent of past transformative changes from mainframes to PCs, and from the web to smartphones.
  • The financial commitment to AI infrastructure by tech giants is unprecedented, with capital expenditure reaching $400 billion by 2025, surpassing global telecom investments.
  • The convergence of model performance could lead to AI becoming commoditized, challenging companies to redefine their competitive advantages.
  • Despite significant user numbers, AI technologies like ChatGPT face challenges in securing high user engagement, depicting a gap between early interest and regular use.
  • AI’s future promises to restructure industries significantly, but its complete impact remains unpredictable, aligning with historical patterns where new tech eventually integrates as infrastructure.

WEEX Crypto News, 2025-11-27 09:13:23

Introduction: AI’s Unseen Potential

In the rapidly evolving sphere of technology, artificial intelligence (AI) stands as a monumental force reshaping industries. Despite its pervasive influence, AI’s true form and future implications remain only partially understood. In a compelling report titled “AI Eats the World” by renowned tech analyst and former a16z partner Benedict Evans, AI is projected to trigger the next significant shift in the tech industry’s evolution — a seismic transition that occurs every ten to fifteen years. These shifts have historically redefined industry landscapes: from the dominance of mainframes to the ascendance of personal computers (PCs), and later, to the nearly ubiquitous presence of smartphones and the internet.

As Evans explains, the unexpected emergence of technologies like ChatGPT in 2022 might just be the catalyst for this new era of profound transformation. This article digs deeper into the insights presented by Evans, exploring the historical cycles of technological shifts, the unprecedented capital investments in AI by major corporations, the challenges of AI becoming commoditized, and the complex landscape of user engagement.

The Historical Pattern of Technological Shifts

History has shown that approximately every decade and a half, a major technological shift or platform transition occurs, revolutionizing the tech world. These transitions have historically altered the industry’s core structures, paving the way for novel interactions and business models.

For instance, Microsoft, once a dominant force in the PC era, found itself significantly diminished in the mobile era. Its operating system market share plummeted from nearly universal coverage to less than 20% by 2025. Similarly, Apple, which initially led the personal computer market, was sidelined by IBM-compatible machines. This cycle illustrates a harsh reality: companies leading in one era often struggle or fail to maintain their leadership post-transition.

As a new wave of AI technologies builds momentum, tech giants face the challenge of navigating these shifts or risking obsolescence. Evans, in his report, identifies this recurring theme — while the exact implications of the current AI-driven shift are uncertain, its historical inevitability is clear.

The Unprecedented Investment in AI Infrastructure

The transformative potential of AI is mirrored in the massive financial commitments from leading tech firms like Microsoft, Amazon’s AWS, Google, and Meta. These companies are collectively projected to invest $400 billion in AI infrastructure by 2025, dwarfing the annual $300 billion investment in the telecom sector. This fervent investment underscores the industry’s recognition of AI as not just an incremental advancement, but rather an existential pivot for the tech landscape.

The construction of cutting-edge data centers in the U.S. exemplifies this trend. These facilities are rapidly outpacing the construction of traditional office spaces, highlighting a shift in what drives investment cycles. Companies like Nvidia are hitting supply bottlenecks as they strive to meet this surging demand, often surpassing the long-established revenue benchmarks set by industry stalwarts like Intel.

One of the critical bottlenecks in this infrastructure push is the availability of power supply, semiconductor components, and fiber-optic access, which are essential for data center expansion. Despite a modest increase in the U.S. power supply, AI’s demands represent an additional 1% of energy needs, posing unique challenges and requiring swift adaptation in infrastructure capabilities.

AI as a Commodity: The Vanishing Moat

Despite extensive investment, a fascinating dilemma emerges: large language models’ performance differences are narrowing, raising concerns about AI becoming a ‘commodity’. Evans highlights the potential implication of this convergence — market leaders in AI performance shift frequently as their technical capabilities begin to match closely.

In commoditized markets, traditional competitive advantages lose potency. For AI companies, this means rethinking strategies to build new moats around their offerings. Possibilities include innovation in compute capacity, vertical datasets, superior product experiences, or diversified distribution channels. Without these differentiators, the future of AI could see value capture redistributed among new and existing players, altering competitive dynamics in the tech sector.

The Engagement Conundrum: The Story of ChatGPT

ChatGPT’s claim of having 8 billion weekly active users paints a picture of widespread adoption and engagement. Yet, detailed user involvement studies present a more nuanced reality. While impressive in reach, ChatGPT and similar AI technologies face hurdles in translating their sizable user base into high engagement. In the U.S., only a fraction of users interact with AI chatbots daily. Instead, many users explore these technologies sporadically, indicating an initial curiosity rather than consistent utility.

Evans categorizes this trend as the ‘engagement illusion.’ It’s a familiar story where emerging technologies experience rapid initial uptake, yet struggle to cement their place in users’ everyday lives. The gap between capability and practical application remains substantial, highlighting the need for intuitive integration into diverse workflows and daily routines.

Corporations reflect this gradual adoption curve as well. Despite widespread enthusiasm for AI integration, a smaller portion has moved past experimental phases into full production deployment. Survey data indicates that while 25% of enterprises have deployed AI applications, the majority still remain in planning stages, set for post-2025 implementation. Current successes largely involve piecemeal applications such as coding support and customer service automation—areas yet to herald a full-scale business transformation.

AI’s Impact on Advertising and Recommendation Systems

The advertising and recommendation landscape is perhaps the sector most poised for disruption by AI. Traditional systems relied heavily on ‘relevance’, a model that AI can supplant with the nuanced understanding of ‘user intent’. This shift promises to upend the foundational mechanisms of the trillion-dollar advertisement industry.

Early data from giants like Google and Meta underscore significant performance boosts when deploying AI-driven strategies. Reported improvements in conversion rates range from 3% to 14%, showcasing AI’s potential to revolutionize ad targeting efficacy. Moreover, the cost associated with ad creative production is likely to see reductions, courtesy of automated content generation capabilities.

Lessons from Automation: When AI Fades into the Background

Reflecting on historical precedents, Evans draws parallels to past automation milestones that sparked initial debates but quietly integrated into the societal infrastructure over time. The transformation of enemies turned allies could be seen in the disappearance of elevator operators and the adoption of barcodes in inventory management, reshaping how businesses operated from behind the scenes.

This historical lens reiterates a crucial point: technologies pivotal in their time often fade into ubiquity, ceasing to be seen as ‘tech’ as they become intrinsic to daily operations. Similarly, AI may eventually become another layer in the fabric of daily operations, losing its standalone label as ‘AI’.

Projecting AI’s Future Role and Value Capture

Evans posits that as AI continues its ascent, it’s on track to redefine industries while still grappling with uncertainty about its ultimate form. Companies may engage in a strategic pivot from network-driven successes towards battles over resources and investment capabilities.

Three primary pathways could emerge in this environment: businesses might leverage economies of scale for downstream dominance, exploit network effects for upstream success, or venture into innovative competitive arenas. An examination of Microsoft’s evolving strategies reveals this transition from network-centric to capital-centric models of competition, where increasing capital expenditures signal a fundamental shift in sustaining leadership.

OpenAI’s broad-spectrum strategy — involving infrastructure partnerships with companies like Oracle, technological milestones with Nvidia and Intel, and platform integrations across varied digital environments — exemplifies the comprehensive engagements necessary for thriving in this evolving AI landscape.

Conclusion: A New Era in Tech Evolution

As the AI narrative unfolds, it draws us into a future both familiar and unknown. While parallels to past shifts offer guidance, AI’s unique complexities present fresh challenges and opportunities. Evans emphasizes that the unfolding AI revolution is set to not only modify existing paradigms but also to potentially craft entirely new sectors. As we stand on this cusp of technological transformation, the full script of AI’s impact and integration remains unwritten, promising a captivating evolution for industries and societies alike.

FAQs

What is driving the current investment surge in AI by tech giants?

The current investment surge in AI by tech giants is driven by the recognition of AI’s transformative potential across industries. These investments are seen as critical for building the necessary infrastructure to support AI’s integration and to maintain a competitive edge in a rapidly evolving tech landscape.

Why is AI becoming commoditized, and what does this mean for the industry?

AI is becoming commoditized because the differences in performance among leading large language models are diminishing. This convergence challenges companies to find new competitive advantages, as traditional differentiators lose significance. It signals a shift where innovation in computing power, specialized datasets, and product experience becomes crucial for maintaining market leadership.

How does AI’s impact on advertising differ from traditional systems?

AI impacts advertising by shifting the focus from mere relevance to understanding user intent, providing deeper insights into consumer behavior. This approach enhances targeting precision and efficiency, leading to higher conversion rates and reduced costs in ad production, fundamentally reshaping the advertising industry.

What are the historical precedents for technology becoming infrastructure?

Historical precedents for technology transitioning to infrastructure include the disappearance of elevator operators due to automation and the integration of barcodes in supply chains. These technologies, once revolutionary, became deeply embedded and ceased to be recognized as standalone innovations.

What are the future implications of AI for businesses and industries?

The future implications of AI for businesses and industries include significant transformations in operational processes, customer engagement, and market strategies. While AI’s full impact remains uncertain, it is clear that it will drive substantial changes, requiring strategic adaptation and investment to harness its potential fully.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News