The Rise of Equity Tokens: A New Era for Cryptocurrency

By: crypto insight|2025/11/27 17:30:04
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • The cryptocurrency market is undergoing a shift from speculative tokens to equity-based models, driven by economic realism.
  • Speculative demand has led to overvaluation, but now the focus is moving to tokens backed by real-world fundamentals.
  • DeFi tokens with the potential to claim protocol revenue are likely to gain prominence, backed by a stable ecosystem of stablecoins and derivatives.
  • Investors are seeking genuine profit opportunities, with the DeFi landscape providing nuanced insights into revenue-earning potential.

WEEX Crypto News, 2025-11-27 09:03:44

In the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrencies, the last five years have seen a dramatic transformation. From the giddy heights of speculation-fueled tokens to the more grounded reality of equity-based models, the market is gradually adapting to a new norm where substance trumps spectacle. This transition marks a cleansing process, a recalibration of what holds economic value in the digital sphere.

The Speculation Era: A Reckoning

For years, speculative fever gripped the crypto market, pushing values well beyond intrinsic worth. Tokens thrived on a potent mix of investor hype and fear of missing out, driving valuations to unsustainable levels. But now, the industry stands on the cusp of change, where the fundamentals come to the forefront.

The speculative excesses stemmed from the scarcity of fundamentally sound liquid assets in crypto. Bitcoins and altcoins became the default vehicles for capital injection. Unseasoned retail investors, enticed by tales of Bitcoin riches, ventured into lesser-known tokens, inflating their demand disproportionately to their actual utility.

The Folly of Overvaluation

The nascent cryptocurrency market was prone to youthful exuberance. That exuberance, however, masked underlying weaknesses in many tokens’ value propositions. The first effect of this mentality was that during market downturns, any asset’s value appeared promising if held for the long-term—a belief reminiscent of the saying, “Buy low, sell high.” But more systemic was the model that emerged in the realms of crypto business: one that focused more on token issuance than on generating tangible income tied to actual services or products.

In recent years, the ripple effects of this model became apparent. Platforms commodifying token sales proliferated, leading to an oversaturation that fragmented investor attention across countless assets—over 50,000 new tokens emerged on some days. These platforms enabled widespread accessibility but also spread investment too thinly across too many projects, disrupting the historical patterns seen around Bitcoin halving events and associated market benefits.

The New Asset Class: Real-World Fundamentals

As the industry matured, a subset of crypto assets began demonstrating true fundamental value. Tokens like HYPE and IPO projects like CRCL introduced a refreshing change by directly tying their value to real, predictable cash flows. Amid such developments, the crypto market had to face an uncomfortable truth: in many instances, tech stocks related to AI, robotics, and biotech outperformed cryptocurrencies. Even the NASDAQ index saw better results than Bitcoin and various altcoins in the period leading up to today’s trends.

The consequence? Poorly performing altcoins now litter the metaphorical “cemetery” of missed opportunities. Teams scrabble for investment and reputational clout as they navigate an increasingly constrained landscape. Savvy investors are urged to reevaluate their strategies, understanding that tokens must either represent business ownership or lack any intrinsic value.

Rethinking the Value of Tokens

Tokens, once misconceived as magically valuable in their community-driven contexts, are now scrutinized for their capacity to generate future cash flow. Discarding the naïve assumption that tokens can acquire value purely through being, the dialogue has shifted to a more realistic perspective that recognizes them as proxy claims on business revenue streams.

This shift brings to light the categorical distinction between network tokens, such as Bitcoin, which act more akin to commodities, and protocol tokens that are ostensibly equity-like but often fall short of delivering real shareholder value. In the foreseeable future, only those DeFi tokens that operate as quasi-equity will hold practical value, marked by two critical attributes: a claim on protocol revenue and a sufficiently attractive revenue stream to back up that claim.

The Retail Exodus from Crypto

Amidst this transition, retail investors, once the fervent fuel of the crypto fire, are retreating. Burned by previous losses and unmet promises, they are shifting their gaze to less volatile, more traditional avenues of investment. Moreover, a surfeit of memecoins and predatory tokenomics further propels this exodus. This oversaturation has left a market teeming with poorly conceived projects, where participation feels like gambling rather than investing.

Meanwhile, prominent voices in the crypto world argued that legality was not at odds with deception, leaving potential investors wary of stepping into what could easily become a trap. Consequently, this level of cynicism and disenchantment has lowered general interest in the industry, even as the underpinning technologies and use cases improve and regulatory frameworks solidify.

The AI Effect: Impact on Crypto Interest

Introducing technologies like ChatGPT and broader AI trends have inadvertently pulled attention away from blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The tangible, everyday changes that AI brings are palpable—reshaping industries and daily life in rapid, observable ways. Comparatively, crypto’s revolutionary dream seems more abstract, less urgent amid AI’s compelling reality.

Notably, the Great Crypto-AI Battle lays bare the skews in engagement metrics, with interest in artificial intelligence far surpassing that in cryptocurrencies. The last time crypto surpassed AI in search interest was during Bitcoin’s notorious dips, like the FTX collapse—a stark indication of the pressures on the crypto market to reinvent its narrative to reclaim interest.

Will Retail Investors Return?

A rebound of retail interest in crypto isn’t off the cards, though certain conditions must materialize. Having ventured into alternatives like binary options or predictive markets, investors still wield a speculative appetite but seek better assurance of profit potential. DeFi tokens promising credible revenue-backed opportunities present one such path, provided they align investor expectations with tangible outcomes.

Core Drivers of Token Value: Protocol Revenue

Token value, in essence, must hinge on substantive grounds. As speculative buy-ins wane, tokens need underlying value propositions like claims on protocol-generated income. Extending beyond promises, value accumulation translates into claims on concrete assets or income streams, whether through dividends, buybacks, fee burns, or treasury controls—all indicatives of real ownership.

Though a protocol might not initially engage in these activities, having the capability to activate value mechanisms is crucial for long-term retention and attractiveness. Transparent governance, clear activation conditions, and the preference for trust-building roadmaps foster an environment where real value propositions can flourish.

Top Performers in the DeFi Arena

Peering into the crypto ecosystem through analytical lenses like DefiLlama highlights emerging powerhouses. In the last 30 days, protocols drawing significant income hinge on stability mechanisms and derivative platforms, with noteworthy participation from launchpads, trading apps, CDPs, decentralized exchanges, and borrowing protocols.

The observations here underscore the resilience of trading-oriented models, though their sustainability might hinge on engaging with real-world assets—a pivot underway in ventures like Hyperliquid. Equally, recognition of distribution channel command emerges as vital, rivaling the intrinsic value of foundational protocols.

Key Investment Strategies for the Future

Looking ahead, investors must recalibrate their lenses, scanning for high-performing tokens exhibiting promising fundamentals:

  • Clear claims on protocol income or transparent paths to potential income.
  • Consistent, upward-trending revenues and returns.
  • Market valuation aligning reasonably with ongoing earnings.

Curve Finance, an illustrative example, has witnessed steady revenue growth over the years despite challenges like dilution in FDV. Locking Curve tokens bolsters returns, highlighting the growth potential that vigorous protocols may offer if they sustain income levels.

Jupiter follows suit, riding Solana’s growth tide as a key DEX aggregator and perp DEX. It consistently delivers handsome income to token holders, a testament to adept operational maneuvers and strategic acquisitions expanding across blockchain ecosystems.

Comparably thriving protocols include Hyperliquid, Sky, Aerodrome, and Pendle, all hedging against market traps by grounding tokens in revenue-centric narratives.

Bright Prospects: Hope Amidst Change

Despite past turbulences, a renewed focus among teams understanding survival hinges on tangible income offers a glimmer of hope. This shift forecasts a future where DeFi projects align tokens to income sources, promising robust developments for those attuned to navigate wisely.

The transitory pleasures once inherent in speculative markets are replaced by strategic fortitude—a hopeful trend towards sustainable growth and investor trust.

FAQ

How is the crypto market evolving?

The crypto market is shifting from speculative token models to equity-based structures tied to real-world fundamentals, essentially valuing tokens based on protocol income rather than hype.

What caused the shift from speculative to equity tokens?

Overvaluation due to excessive speculative demand led to this shift. Inadequate fundamental backing made many tokens lose credibility, pushing the market toward more substance-driven evaluations.

Why are AI trends affecting interest in cryptocurrencies?

The rise of AI technologies provides tangible, everyday impacts that seize public attention, contrasting with crypto’s abstract advancements, reducing its immediate appeal.

Will retail investors return to the crypto market?

They might return if the market provides credible and profitable opportunities. Tokens linked to real incomes and substantiated value propositions can rekindle interest.

What are DeFi tokens, and why are they gaining attention?

DeFi tokens, tied to protocol income and exhibiting equity-like potential, are gaining prominence for offering tangible value through income claims, poised as attractive investments against speculative counterparts.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.