The Rise of x402 in the Dawn of the Machine Economy: A Revolutionary Leap in AI Trading

By: crypto insight|2025/12/03 16:30:08
0
Share
copy

Key Takeaways

  • The x402 protocol, developed by Coinbase, revitalizes the dormant HTTP 402 status code, enabling AI to autonomously engage in economic transactions without human intervention.
  • The emergence of x402 symbolizes the rise of the “machine economy,” where AI agents can independently initiate and complete transactions, challenging traditional financial infrastructures.
  • Despite its revolutionary potential, x402 presents significant legal and regulatory challenges, necessitating careful navigation through compliance and data privacy frameworks.
  • Ensuring security in x402 applications is crucial, as highlighted by past security incidents, demanding robust safeguards and contingency measures.

WEEX Crypto News, 2025-12-03 08:03:21

Unveiling the x402 Protocol’s Ambition to Revolutionize AI Transactions

In 1996, the architects of the HTTP protocol introduced the “402 Payment Required” status code, envisioning a world where digital payments are seamlessly integrated into the internet. For decades, this code lingered in the shadows, a “ghost code” due to the absence of supporting payment infrastructure. Fast forward to today, and this notion has been reimagined by the blockchain giant, Coinbase, who has unveiled the x402 protocol. This innovative initiative aims to awaken the dormant HTTP 402, transforming it into a beacon for AI-driven autonomous transactions—a veritable digital cash register for the burgeoning machine economy.

As artificial intelligence—spanning weather service robots to autonomous vehicles—begins to autonomously navigate transactions such as purchasing real-time data or paying transit fees, the traditional payment paradigms reliant on lengthy processes like account setup, authentication, and authorization are being dismantled. The x402 protocol is forging a new path by enabling a streamlined process of “HTTP request – 402 response – blockchain payment – service delivery,” facilitating machine-to-machine transactions without human mediation. This shift in transactional dynamics underpins the rise of the machine economy—a natural evolution akin to historical paradigms like the age of exploration that spurred the creation of insurance, or the industrial revolution that birthed commercial banking.

More than just a theoretical construct, the x402 protocol promises immediate settlement, negligible fees, and cross-chain flexibility, altogether challenging existing barriers in traditional payment systems and propelling automated transactions into legally ambiguous realms. While this evolution is promising, it prompts questions about legal responsibility and regulatory compliance in a landscape far removed from established norms.

Decoding the x402 Protocol’s Functionality: A Glimpse into the Autonomous Payment Arena

The x402 protocol functions as an emblem of the digital world’s “unmanned convenience store,” streamlining interactions typically seen in consumer e-commerce into instantaneous machine-level exchanges. Here’s a step-by-step look at how it accomplishes this:

  • AI Initiates Request: Much like a consumer selecting goods on a website, an AI requests data or services by sending a resource request to a server.
  • 402 Payment Challenge: In response, the server issues an HTTP 402 prompting a payment requirement, akin to digital price tagging that details the amount (say in USDC), the receipt address, and the blockchain validation criteria needed.
  • On-Chain Signature and Payment: The AI, integrating a Web3 wallet, creates a transactional signature effortlessly embedded into the HTTP request header, negating the need for passwords or codes.
  • Blockchain Transaction and Settlement: Once the server confirms the signature, it broadcasts the transaction for blockchain confirmation, typically within 3-5 seconds. Successful confirmation results in granting the AI access to the desired data or service.

This “request-to-payment” model essentially compresses the traditional three-step consumer shopping experience—cart selection, checkout, and payment confirmation—into a sub-second interaction between machines. In advocating this model, AI entities are equipped with newfound economic agency, morphing from passive executors to active digital economic participants capable of initiating contracts and transactions. Typical scenarios include AI agents autonomously procuring cloud computing power, retrieving data sets, accessing premium content, or invoking third-party AI models.

However, alongside the promise of agentic commerce, the x402 exposes significant legal perils, especially concerning liability when autonomous machines err.

Legal and Regulatory Maze: Navigating the Challenges of Automation

AI Accountability: Who Bears the Cost of Errors?

Within the x402 protocol framework, AI agents spearhead the request and completion of transactions. This involvement raises fundamental questions about accountability—especially when errors occur. Under current legal standards, AI entities lack personhood and, therefore, legal responsibility typically reverts to the human developers or operators behind the systems. Decentralization does not absolve them of liability, particularly if decision-making processes inadvertently infringe upon others’ rights or violate laws. Consequently, the trail of responsibility generally leads back to the entities who design, deploy, or own the AI systems.

Additionally, autonomous decision-making inherently involves extensive data analysis, including API usage logs, payment histories, and potentially identifiable user information. These operations must navigate the intricate landscape of data privacy regulations and algorithmic accountability.

Compliance Challenges: Distinguishing Between Wallet Solutions

The security underpinning x402 transactions hinges critically on wallet selection, yet this choice carries significant regulatory implications:

  • Non-Custodial Wallets: Platforms like MetaMask or hardware wallets, where users hold private keys, circumvent Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements. However, users must assume full responsibility for key losses and asset security.
  • Custodial Wallets: If relying on third-party custodians for wallet management or transaction authorizations, these entities typically fall under the purview of regulated money transfer businesses. Compliance demands acquiring necessary licenses and adhering to KYC/Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations, including the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) travel rules. Failure to comply can prompt penalties or legal actions.

The Challenge of Blockchain Interactions and Payment Finality

The classification of payment methods used in x402, predominantly stablecoins like USDC, places them under a global regulatory microscope. Jurisdictions differ in how they define stablecoins, with varying implications:

  • In the United States, handling stablecoins akin to other digital currencies like Bitcoin might require registration with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) as money transmitters.
  • Similarly, under the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, stablecoins are treated as “e-money tokens,” necessitating licensure, reserve holdings, and prudential oversight.

Beyond classification, blockchain payments’ irreversible nature—a fundamental design feature of x402 aimed at simplifying microtransaction processing—presents challenges. The protocol does not inherently provide robust dispute resolution, refunds, or risk mitigation measures, thereby putting user protection in a precarious position. Without established consumer safeguards in many jurisdictions for crypto payments, users bear the burden of transaction outcomes. For instance, if an AI agent mistakes or maliciously diverts funds, recourse may be unattainable.

Security Concerns in Centralized Infrastructure

The implementation of x402 often involves light middlewares that interact with service providers’ servers rather than a standalone on-chain smart contract. Many x402 projects currently operate by establishing a server-hosted service on the official platform, which then communicates with the blockchain via the project’s own server to distribute tokens. This exposes systemic vulnerabilities. If, for instance, an administrator’s private key on these servers becomes compromised, as seen in the October incident with @402bridge, where key leakage led to approximately $17,693 in USDC losses for over 200 users, the repercussions are significant. The introduction of smart contracts to manage payments or complete transactions can thus elevate risks of single-point failures or incorrect executions.

Charting a Course for Compliance: Balancing Innovation and Regulation

Businesses employing the x402 protocol should establish multifaceted compliance architectures:

Navigating Cross-Border Compliance Landscapes

Regulatory Navigation: A dynamic approach must be devised to adapt compliance strategies based on transaction counterparties’ jurisdictions. This requires prompt establishment of compliance orientations and a licensing framework upon identifying target markets. It also involves developing a mechanism to routinely monitor legislative and enforcement trends in domains like automated payments and digital assets.

Thorough AML and KYC Procedures: Following FATF travel guidance and national directives, companies should institute robust customer identification and transaction surveillance systems. Transaction participants’ identities and intents must be verified, with extensive records on transaction originations and purposes kept as far as possible.

On-chain Activity Monitoring: Implementing blockchain analytics to identify potential terror financing or sanctioned addresses is crucial in mitigating risks like money laundering.

Partitioning Legal Responsibilities

AI Compliance and Privacy Considerations: Evaluating AI models and decision systems for transparency and non-discrimination compliance is necessary. Where personal decisions are involved, providing explanatory mechanisms and opportunities for user appeals or human intervention is paramount.

Legal Definition and Contractual Clarity: Distinctly defining legal constructs such as AI agents’ roles, token/legal tender attributes, and relevant contracts’ functionalities is vital. Drafting detailed service agreements with users and providers that stipulate rights, obligations, dispute resolution, and applicable laws is advisable.

Risk Mitigation Steps: Given the irreversible nature of digital payments and smart contract hazards, diversification in risk measures can be beneficial. For example, setting daily or per-transaction caps on AI agent accounts, independently auditing smart contracts, and implementing emergency “circuit breaker” functions can mitigate potential risks. Especially for custodial contract operations, operators need to separate operational and client funds in management.

End-users leveraging x402-type automated payment services need proactive protection to mitigate legal and operational risks:

Security Precautions: Verify platforms’ financial licenses and regulatory registrations before use, avoid initiating x402 payments through unsolicited links, and refrain from transacting with unlicensed entities. Utilizing mainstream stablecoins with regulatory backing as payment instruments is recommended. When using non-custodial wallets, secure private keys using hardware solutions, never storing them in plain text on internet-connected servers.

Authorization Management: Define stringent transaction limits and authorization rules for AI payment agents, avoid granting “unlimited authority,” and regularly review and update authorization settings.

Evidence Retention: Maintain comprehensive records of on-chain transaction hashes, service agreements, and payment receipts to ensure ample evidence in case of disputes.

Monitor Regulatory Developments: Keep abreast of legal changes affecting crypto payments and AI decisions within your jurisdiction to ensure continuous legal compliance.

Conclusion: Navigating the Intersection of Code and Law

The x402 protocol’s emergence epitomizes a challenge akin to the 17th-century financial shift from precious metals to paper instruments—a precursor to new economic models precede established regulations. Yet, incidents like the @402bridge security breach remind us of the shared import of resilient technical foundations and matured regulatory landscapes. As the European Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulations stipulate monthly auditing of stablecoin reserves, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) extends oversight of AI decisions under the Algorithm Accountability Act, such apparents hurdles are paving a framework for safe machine economies.

Ultimately, the contest for future dominance will be one of compliance acumen. Innovation is found not in bypassing rules but in carving out the grammar of tomorrow’s economy within existing regulatory gaps.

FAQ

What is the x402 protocol?

The x402 protocol, developed by Coinbase, revitalizes the dormant HTTP 402 status code, enabling AI to independently engage in transactions across digital platforms using blockchain technology and smart contracts.

What are the potential legal challenges associated with x402?

The legal challenges of x402 include questions of AI accountability, compliance with varying international financial regulations, data privacy concerns, and the irreversible nature of blockchain transactions, which may complicate dispute resolution and user protection.

How does the x402 protocol change the traditional payment process?

x402 revolutionizes payment processes by enabling direct, machine-initiated transactions that bypass traditional steps like account verifications, integrating signatures directly into HTTP requests for faster and more secure confirmations.

What measures can be taken to ensure security in x402 transactions?

Security measures for x402 transactions include using secure storage for private keys, implementing careful monitoring of on-chain activities, setting transaction limits for AI agents, and ensuring legal compliance with each transaction’s jurisdictional requirements.

How does x402 facilitate the rise of the machine economy?

x402 supports the machine economy by allowing AI and other digital agents to autonomously conduct transactions, effectively acting as economic agents rather than passive executors of programming, thus necessitating new infrastructures and regulatory frameworks.

You may also like

Token Cannot Compound, Where Is the Real Investment Opportunity?

The next chapter in the crypto industry will undoubtedly be written by Crypto-empowered Stocks.

February 6th Market Key Intelligence, How Much Did You Miss?

1. On-chain Flows: $508.2M USD inflow to Ethereum today; $390.8M USD outflow from Arbitrum 2. Biggest Gainers/Losers: $HBTC, $AIO 3. Top News: Current Bitcoin weekly RSI oversold signal comparable to June 2022

China's Central Bank and Eight Other Departments' Latest Regulatory Focus: Key Attention to RWA Tokenized Asset Risk


Foreword: Today, the People's Bank of China's website published the "Notice of the People's Bank of China, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration for Market Regulation, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission, State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Preventing and Dealing with Risks Related to Virtual Currency and Others (Yinfa [2026] No. 42)", the latest regulatory requirements from the eight departments including the central bank, which are basically consistent with the regulatory requirements of recent years. The main focus of the regulation is on speculative activities such as virtual currency trading, exchanges, ICOs, overseas platform services, and this time, regulatory oversight of RWA has been added, explicitly prohibiting RWA tokenization, stablecoins (especially those pegged to the RMB). The following is the full text:


To the people's governments of all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps:


  Recently, there have been speculative activities related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets (RWA) tokenization, disrupting the economic and financial order and jeopardizing the property security of the people. In order to further prevent and address the risks related to virtual currency and Real-World Assets tokenization, effectively safeguard national security and social stability, in accordance with the "Law of the People's Republic of China on the People's Bank of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Commercial Banks," "Securities Law of the People's Republic of China," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Securities Investment Funds," "Law of the People's Republic of China on Futures and Derivatives," "Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of Renminbi," "Regulations on Prevention and Disposal of Illegal Fundraising," "Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration," "Telecommunications Regulations of the People's Republic of China," and other provisions, after reaching consensus with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and with the approval of the State Council, the relevant matters are notified as follows:


  I. Clarify the essential attributes of virtual currency, Real-World Assets tokenization, and related business activities


  (I) Virtual currency does not possess the legal status equivalent to fiat currency. Virtual currencies such as Bitcoin, Ether, Tether, etc., have the main characteristics of being issued by non-monetary authorities, using encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technology, existing in digital form, etc. They do not have legal tender status, should not and cannot be circulated and used as currency in the market.


  The business activities related to virtual currency are classified as illegal financial activities. The exchange of fiat currency and virtual currency within the territory, exchange of virtual currencies, acting as a central counterparty in buying and selling virtual currencies, providing information intermediary and pricing services for virtual currency transactions, token issuance financing, and trading of virtual currency-related financial products, etc., fall under illegal financial activities, such as suspected illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public issuance of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, etc., are strictly prohibited across the board and resolutely banned in accordance with the law. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to provide virtual currency-related services to domestic entities in any form.


  A stablecoin pegged to a fiat currency indirectly fulfills some functions of the fiat currency in circulation. Without the consent of relevant authorities in accordance with the law and regulations, any domestic or foreign entity or individual is not allowed to issue a RMB-pegged stablecoin overseas.


(II)Tokenization of Real-World Assets refers to the use of encryption technology and distributed ledger or similar technologies to transform ownership rights, income rights, etc., of assets into tokens (tokens) or other interests or bond certificates with token (token) characteristics, and carry out issuance and trading activities.


  Engaging in the tokenization of real-world assets domestically, as well as providing related intermediary, information technology services, etc., which are suspected of illegal issuance of token vouchers, unauthorized public offering of securities, illegal operation of securities and futures business, illegal fundraising, and other illegal financial activities, shall be prohibited; except for relevant business activities carried out with the approval of the competent authorities in accordance with the law and regulations and relying on specific financial infrastructures. Overseas entities and individuals are not allowed to illegally provide services related to the tokenization of real-world assets to domestic entities in any form.


  II. Sound Work Mechanism


  (III) Inter-agency Coordination. The People's Bank of China, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of virtual currency-related illegal financial activities.


  The China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with the National Development and Reform Commission, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other departments, will improve the work mechanism, strengthen coordination with the Cyberspace Administration of China, the Supreme People's Court, and the Supreme People's Procuratorate, coordinate efforts, and overall guide regions to carry out risk prevention and disposal of illegal financial activities related to the tokenization of real-world assets.


  (IV) Strengthening Local Implementation. The people's governments at the provincial level are overall responsible for the prevention and disposal of risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets in their respective administrative regions. The specific leading department is the local financial regulatory department, with participation from branches and dispatched institutions of the State Council's financial regulatory department, telecommunications regulators, public security, market supervision, and other departments, in coordination with cyberspace departments, courts, and procuratorates, to improve the normalization of the work mechanism, effectively connect with the relevant work mechanisms of central departments, form a cooperative and coordinated working pattern between central and local governments, effectively prevent and properly handle risks related to virtual currencies and the tokenization of real-world assets, and maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  III. Strengthened Risk Monitoring, Prevention, and Disposal


  (5) Enhanced Risk Monitoring. The People's Bank of China, China Securities Regulatory Commission, National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, Ministry of Public Security, State Administration of Foreign Exchange, Cyberspace Administration of China, and other departments continue to improve monitoring techniques and system support, enhance cross-departmental data analysis and sharing, establish sound information sharing and cross-validation mechanisms, promptly grasp the risk situation of activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization. Local governments at all levels give full play to the role of local monitoring and early warning mechanisms. Local financial regulatory authorities, together with branches and agencies of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, as well as departments of cyberspace and public security, ensure effective connection between online monitoring, offline investigation, and fund tracking, efficiently and accurately identify activities related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly share risk information, improve early warning information dissemination, verification, and rapid response mechanisms.


  (6) Strengthened Oversight of Financial Institutions, Intermediaries, and Technology Service Providers. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing account opening, fund transfer, and clearing services for virtual currency-related business activities, issuing and selling financial products related to virtual currency, including virtual currency and related financial products in the scope of collateral, conducting insurance business related to virtual currency, or including virtual currency in the scope of insurance liability. Financial institutions (including non-bank payment institutions) are prohibited from providing custody, clearing, and settlement services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related business and related financial products. Relevant intermediary institutions and information technology service providers are prohibited from providing intermediary, technical, or other services for unauthorized real-world asset tokenization-related businesses and related financial products.


  (7) Enhanced Management of Internet Information Content and Access. Internet enterprises are prohibited from providing online business venues, commercial displays, marketing, advertising, or paid traffic diversion services for virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities. Upon discovering clues of illegal activities, they should promptly report to relevant departments and provide technical support and assistance for related investigations and inquiries. Based on the clues transferred by the financial regulatory authorities, the cyberspace administration, telecommunications authorities, and public security departments should promptly close and deal with websites, mobile applications (including mini-programs), and public accounts engaged in virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization-related business activities in accordance with the law.


  (8) Strengthened Entity Registration and Advertisement Management. Market supervision departments strengthen entity registration and management, and enterprise and individual business registrations must not contain terms such as "virtual currency," "virtual asset," "cryptocurrency," "crypto asset," "stablecoin," "real-world asset tokenization," or "RWA" in their names or business scopes. Market supervision departments, together with financial regulatory authorities, legally enhance the supervision of advertisements related to virtual currency and real-world asset tokenization, promptly investigating and handling relevant illegal advertisements.


  (IX) Continued Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities. The National Development and Reform Commission, together with relevant departments, strictly controls virtual currency mining activities, continuously promotes the rectification of virtual currency mining activities. The people's governments of various provinces take overall responsibility for the rectification of "mining" within their respective administrative regions. In accordance with the requirements of the National Development and Reform Commission and other departments in the "Notice on the Rectification of Virtual Currency Mining Activities" (NDRC Energy-saving Building [2021] No. 1283) and the provisions of the "Guidance Catalog for Industrial Structure Adjustment (2024 Edition)," a comprehensive review, investigation, and closure of existing virtual currency mining projects are conducted, new mining projects are strictly prohibited, and mining machine production enterprises are strictly prohibited from providing mining machine sales and other services within the country.


  (X) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal Financial Activities. Upon discovering clues to illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets, local financial regulatory authorities, branches of the State Council's financial regulatory authorities, and other relevant departments promptly investigate, determine, and properly handle the issues in accordance with the law, and seriously hold the relevant entities and individuals legally responsible. Those suspected of crimes are transferred to the judicial authorities for processing according to the law.


 (XI) Severe Crackdown on Related Illegal and Criminal Activities. The Ministry of Public Security, the People's Bank of China, the State Administration for Market Regulation, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, as well as judicial and procuratorial organs, in accordance with their respective responsibilities, rigorously crack down on illegal and criminal activities related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, such as fraud, money laundering, illegal business operations, pyramid schemes, illegal fundraising, and other illegal and criminal activities carried out under the guise of virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, etc.


  (XII) Strengthen Industry Self-discipline. Relevant industry associations should enhance membership management and policy advocacy, based on their own responsibilities, advocate and urge member units to resist illegal financial activities related to virtual currency and the tokenization of real-world assets. Member units that violate regulatory policies and industry self-discipline rules are to be disciplined in accordance with relevant self-regulatory management regulations. By leveraging various industry infrastructure, conduct risk monitoring related to virtual currency, the tokenization of real-world assets, and promptly transfer issue clues to relevant departments.


  IV. Strict Supervision of Domestic Entities Engaging in Overseas Business Activities


(XIII) Without the approval of relevant departments in accordance with the law and regulations, domestic entities and foreign entities controlled by them may not issue virtual currency overseas.


  (XIV) Domestic entities engaging directly or indirectly in overseas external debt-based tokenization of real-world assets, or conducting asset securitization activities abroad based on domestic ownership rights, income rights, etc. (hereinafter referred to as domestic equity), should be strictly regulated in accordance with the principles of "same business, same risk, same rules." The National Development and Reform Commission, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, and other relevant departments regulate it according to their respective responsibilities. For other forms of overseas real-world asset tokenization activities based on domestic equity by domestic entities, the China Securities Regulatory Commission, together with relevant departments, supervise according to their division of responsibilities. Without the consent and filing of relevant departments, no unit or individual may engage in the above-mentioned business.


  (15) Overseas subsidiaries and branches of domestic financial institutions providing Real World Asset Tokenization-related services overseas shall do so legally and prudently. They shall have professional personnel and systems in place to effectively mitigate business risks, strictly implement customer onboarding, suitability management, anti-money laundering requirements, and incorporate them into the domestic financial institutions' compliance and risk management system. Intermediaries and information technology service providers offering Real World Asset Tokenization services abroad based on domestic equity or conducting Real World Asset Tokenization business in the form of overseas debt for domestic entities directly or indirectly venturing abroad must strictly comply with relevant laws and regulations. They should establish and improve relevant compliance and internal control systems in accordance with relevant normative requirements, strengthen business and risk control, and report the business developments to the relevant regulatory authorities for approval or filing.


  V. Strengthen Organizational Implementation


  (16) Strengthen organizational leadership and overall coordination. All departments and regions should attach great importance to the prevention of risks related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization, strengthen organizational leadership, clarify work responsibilities, form a long-term effective working mechanism with centralized coordination, local implementation, and shared responsibilities, maintain high pressure, dynamically monitor risks, effectively prevent and mitigate risks in an orderly and efficient manner, legally protect the property security of the people, and make every effort to maintain economic and financial order and social stability.


  (17) Widely carry out publicity and education. All departments, regions, and industry associations should make full use of various media and other communication channels to disseminate information through legal and policy interpretation, analysis of typical cases, and education on investment risks, etc. They should promote the illegality and harm of virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses and their manifestations, fully alert to potential risks and hidden dangers, and enhance public awareness and identification capabilities for risk prevention.


  VI. Legal Responsibility


  (18) Engaging in illegal financial activities related to virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization in violation of this notice, as well as providing services for virtual currencies and Real World Asset Tokenization-related businesses, shall be punished in accordance with relevant regulations. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law. For domestic entities and individuals who knowingly or should have known that overseas entities illegally provided virtual currency or Real World Asset Tokenization-related services to domestic entities and still assisted them, relevant responsibilities shall be pursued according to the law. If it constitutes a crime, criminal liability shall be pursued according to the law.


  (19) If any unit or individual invests in virtual currencies, Real World Asset Tokens, and related financial products against public order and good customs, the relevant civil legal actions shall be invalid, and any resulting losses shall be borne by them. If there are suspicions of disrupting financial order and jeopardizing financial security, the relevant departments shall deal with them according to the law.


  This notice shall enter into force upon the date of its issuance. The People's Bank of China and ten other departments' "Notice on Further Preventing and Dealing with the Risks of Virtual Currency Trading Speculation" (Yinfa [2021] No. 237) is hereby repealed.


Former Partner's Perspective on Multicoin: Kyle's Exit, But the Game He Left Behind Just Getting Started

Kyle knew his game, so he decided to focus on playing the game he was good at and interested in.

Why Bitcoin Is Falling Now: The Real Reasons Behind BTC's Crash & WEEX's Smart Profit Playbook

Bitcoin's ongoing crash explained: Discover the 5 hidden triggers behind BTC's plunge & how WEEX's Auto Earn and Trade to Earn strategies help traders profit from crypto market volatility.

Wall Street's Hottest Trades See Exodus

This time there is no single triggering factor, but rather market anxiety about asset valuation, with many already skeptical of these valuations being too high, leading to investors choosing to retreat almost simultaneously.

Popular coins

Latest Crypto News

Read more